Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton drew renewed attention on Sunday with a pointed social media post aimed at former President Donald Trump. The post, published on X (formerly Twitter), coincided with Trump’s birthday and sparked widespread reaction across political and public platforms.
Clinton’s message contrasted two events that took place on Saturday: the 250th anniversary celebration of the U.S. Army, which included a large-scale military parade in Washington, D.C., and nationwide gatherings marking Flag Day and what some have called “No Kings Day,” a celebration centered around democratic ideals. In her post, Clinton referred to Trump’s event as a “low-energy Dear Leader parade” and claimed it cost taxpayers $45 million.
Compare and contrast scenes from yesterday in America.
On the one hand, Trump’s low-energy Dear Leader parade (that cost you $45 million).
On the other, millions of people across the country gathering peacefully to say:
Here, we have no kings. pic.twitter.com/T52IW9wvSr
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) June 15, 2025
The remark quickly generated thousands of responses, many of which were critical. Clinton had restricted replies to her post, allowing only a select group of accounts to respond directly. This decision did not stop a wave of quote-posts and indirect responses from others on the platform, many of whom used the opportunity to express continued frustration over her involvement in past political controversies and her repeated criticisms of Trump.
There are very few things that the left and right can agree upon right now. One of them: We never need to hear from Hillary Rodham Clinton again. This is doubly true when it’s on social media, triply so when it involves the military. As for the social… https://t.co/XbH0Jmvj3D pic.twitter.com/1uEx16rpi5
— The Western Journal (@WesternJournalX) June 17, 2025
Hillary Clinton’s attempt to mock President Donald Trump’s military parade honoring the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army backfired on social media with critics from all sides lambasted her for allegedly holding “utter contempt” for the U.S. military. pic.twitter.com/fxXyXtAmOh
— MBishop (@Michael44747798) June 16, 2025
The parade in question was part of a formal commemoration of the founding of the U.S. Army, featuring ceremonial displays and tributes. While Clinton described it as wasteful, others argued it was a legitimate celebration of a significant military milestone. Debate over the cost of the event also followed. Though Clinton cited a $45 million price tag, other sources, including online commenters and aggregated AI-driven data, suggested the actual cost may have been lower, with estimates ranging from $25 million to $45 million. Additionally, reports indicated that much of the funding came from corporate and private sponsors rather than taxpayer dollars.
Clinton’s critics also referenced past controversies, including the 2012 Benghazi attack, to question her credibility on military-related matters. Commenters noted the perceived irony of her criticism, particularly given her high-profile role in the Obama administration during the incident in Libya. Others pointed to her attendance at the recent wedding of Alex Soros, son of billionaire philanthropist George Soros, as inconsistent with her remarks about monarchy and democratic values. The New York Times had previously described the Soros family as “liberal royalty,” adding to the public’s comparison between Clinton’s rhetoric and actions.
@HillaryClinton Well Hillary, the investment in a parade to salute the young men and women, past and present who have for 250 years dedicated their lives to our nation was a darn site more uplifting and entertaining than the previous administrations lauding aberrant behavior, by…
— Enlightened (@Enlight2022) June 15, 2025
Though her post gained support from a small number of users—including one of the 955 accounts she follows—the majority of public interaction involved quote-posts, satire, and criticism. Commentators across the political spectrum engaged with the post, some viewing it as an attempt to stay politically relevant, while others viewed it as a continuation of a long-standing rivalry with Trump.
Clinton, who has largely stepped away from frontline politics since her 2016 presidential election loss, occasionally reemerges in political discussions, particularly in online spaces. Her social media posts often receive intense scrutiny and polarized reactions, especially when involving direct commentary on Trump or other Republican figures.
🚨Eric Trump slams Hillary Clinton for attacking the U.S. Military instead of violent left-wing riots:
“The parade was anything but low energy. Should be looking at the cop cars burning and condemning that, not a parade commemorating servicemen.” pic.twitter.com/JAz2gWkp5l
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) June 16, 2025
The weekend’s online clash is just the latest reminder that some political figures just can’t seem to leave the spotlight, no matter how many elections they’ve lost. Even without a title or office, Hillary Clinton continues to throw punches from the sidelines, often sparking more backlash than applause. As voters across the country focus on real issues impacting their daily lives, many are left wondering why figures from the past keep trying to rewrite the present. One thing’s clear: social media may give them a microphone, but it’s the American people who still have the final word.
